Yes, more complex and realistic sets of stimuli, in more realistic situations, should be encouraged.
I image a group of subjects who have a situation proposed to them, with a number of possible choices to make. After making their choice, they could be offered more information. After receiving the new information, they could choose again from the original options. Any who changed their choice based on the new information would be exhibiting some degree of free choice
The best way to find whether we humans do have free will or not is by understanding more about how actually our brain functions. Is there any particular way that if electrical signals can make someone take decisions in a particular way.
Considering that we must gather data regarding decisions involving a moment of free will, we must first have advances within our nano technology sector to create some form of fmri device that can be on a subjects scalp 24 hours a day. That way we record what activity happened during the moment the subject has to decide. They would have to write down on a notepad every moment they considered they took a decision and that way we can also see when they didnt write something down yet had activity in the brain still.
I think that this should be studied alot deeper. I would suggest it would be interesting to compare response times between adults and children, between a common adult and a Buddhist (example) adult. What if one lives a life trained to be responsive instead of reactionary? How does this effect the neuron responses to physical actions? As we grow our energy bodies learn physical reactions to frequencies we encounter. Some good some bad, once we are adults we have trained our energy bodies to auto respond when encountering said frequencies. Sarcasm frequency = response laughter / challenge frequency = response fear etc. How we handle the 1st encounters with these frequencies will be the programing for our energy body. So children are not fully programed and may show different areas of response in the brain and different response times. Spiritual people are trying to attain a point of not reacting to things but more so responding with thought and sort of disconnected from the outcome of the stimuli and therefore may also show different than an average study subject. Free will may be greatly impacted by the study subjects understanding of what that means. Some people are followers and some people are leaders. Some people react to life, some people respond. I think diving into the later would take this science to a new perspective of how our concious and subconscious coexist.
You must be logged in to reply to this discussion.
Send this to a friend