Professor Dijkgraaf expressed it well when he said that there is one nature so having two theories, one for the very large and one for the very small, is inelegant and seems to be asking for that defining theory that unifies gravity with the other forces. Admittedly, much of the speculation is still more philosophy than science, but this is great, because physics remains open with questions still to be answered. I hope that when these theories are unified, new questions arise out of them.

The tendency is to follow our previous Successes in physics through out unification and symmetry in nature. Different laws are when we understand partially reality, but a unified theory will explain everything at the same time, and that it is why is so important.

I think it just takes reframing the seemingly non-continuous that is actually definably on a continuous scale.

Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,

Do we need unified theories? Do we have a choice? When logic leads us to discover the obvious, if we turn away, we may lose something.

When i was in Nunavut, the circumpolar science led me to think the sun was made of radioactive water. The Parker probes do not confirm this.

When we attempt to unify big and small, we see the spiritual nature of higher energies can cause confusion when not fully defined.

We do not need to unify large and small, but for the energies and truths seeming to underlie them, if there are consistancies, they need recognition.

Often we see tech revolutions are racial, so if the force deciding we need unification exists, the funding will occur.

Quantum gravity also allows the use of gravitons, so here is the dillema- do industry partners yet want population control of movement to access gravitons?

Prof. Robbert has resurrected the concept of an aether foam some have decided is dead, but this very concept allows the USA B2 bomber to fly, so we cannot ignore ether concepts as B2 bombers can go invisible after achieving an escape velocity, and can also hover infinitely.

The bombers were expensive, only 14 made, but in our space exploration era, these allow us to have freedom from the other map lives we often do not see on our Earth planetary map.

Graviton or gravity halo, particle or field, the farther and nearer we look the closer to Unified we will get, far in the telescopes, and near in microscopes and colliders. So we’ll Unify at the point of viewing the beginning and seeing the Planck size piece. Or sooner if someone can see those two points in their mind and writes it out in math.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

While our Nobels attempt to protest war involvement, never a complete agreed circumstance, we can support their teaching.

This diagram shows the unity of the unified theory.

Some make a conversation out of the diagram alone.

Thank you to Brian Greene for WSU, his patience, and to his collaborators that… I think notice an often growing gap between advances and public knowledge.

We are fortunate WSU brings us up to speed on modern events.

https://pin.it/69UATQG

But look for Brian Greene also on Pinterest. He likes plasma pics!
🙂🍵☕🍵🍵

p. s. – The Feynmen diagrams of colours and quarks were never known when i was a kid.

There are good Youtube standard model tutorials online. Fields that hold and uncouple according to only temperature allow plasma a more full range of science.

In space-time, Prof. Greene says black holes grow hotter when smaller- do they reverse the big bang for us to see history in reverse? Do photons recouple to electrons in a black hole?

🙂

As explained so far, a unified theory is important because it will provide a simpler, more coherent, and fundamentally deeper understanding of the universe, enhancing predictive power, consistency, and transformative insights across various scientific disciplines.