World Science Scholars

4.6 The Shape of the Universe

discussion Discussion
Viewing 6 reply threads
    • Einstein showed with General Relativity that the universe doesn’t necessarily need to be a “flat” geometry. But when you hear the word “flat,” you might think of a sort of pancake shape. Is that what Professor Guth means about the shape of our universe? What does it mean to be “flat,” geometrically? How can we know for sure if our universe is “flat”? How would we know if it were some other non-Euclidean geometry?

    • measuring an expansion of a flat shape would be linear vs measurement of a non-flat shape, especially once more than 3 dimensions are considered

    • We can probably measure the historical change of acceleration of the visible universe.

    • You can create a virtual triangle using light from distant stars and see if its angle adds up to 180 degrees in order to determine the universe’s geometry (at least on that scale).

    • We can know by measuring the composition of our universe.

    • Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,

      Most cosmological evidence points to the universe’s density as being just right — the equivalent of around six protons per 1.3 cubic yards — and that it expands in every direction without curving positively or negatively. In other words, the universe is flat, and has flatness🥞

      It expands in every direction without curving positively or negatively. This is Euclidean- it has no curves. 🔶🔷🔶

      Prof. Guth`s proof of flatness allows for flatness on a sphere or a torus.

      Euclidean geometry exists over two dimensions.

      The surface of a sphere is no loner flat. Hyperbolic and elliptical shapes are non-euclidean.
      🔵⚪🔵
      Curves make a non-Euclidean object.

      Attachments:
      You must be logged in to view attached files.
    • I like Rupert’s answer by measuring angle sums from three stars but this only validates that local area.

You must be logged in to reply to this discussion.

Send this to a friend