Just as we feel a beauty regarding an elegant mathematical solution, and we feel a beauty regarding the evolved efficiencies of the natural world, does not mean that there is any rational reason for the beauty, symmetry etc., but it does feel good when there is.

Some laws and models will be intuitive, some counter-intuitive, depending on their similarities with systems and behavior that humans observe on earth and that help form our intuition and established and familiar mental landscape.

When laws of nature make sense, it is in nature. Some things are not there.

The conforming halo allows string theory to be obsolete, as it is a form recognized in other physics.

Counterintuitiveness can turn things on their head, but many things can be upturned.

This has been an interesting thought experiment. Fuzzballs Singularities Quanta all to describe a Microverse within the Universe, maybe once we understand the Universe we will be able to describe the Microverse.

In my view, everything is inherently tied to logic. Without logical frame work, we are left with a void rather than an answer. There is no need for weirdness if follow a realistic and logical path to understand our reality. By strictly adhering to this path, we ensure we are moving in the right direction toward uncovering the truth

No, the laws of nature are under no obligation to conform to human intuition. Counterintuitiveness is an unavoidable consequence when we probe reality beyond our everyday evolutionary scale.
Here is why:
The Evolutionary Bias of Intuition: Our human intuition evolved exclusively to survive in a macroscopic, low-gravity, and low-speed environment. It tells us that time is absolute and solid objects are stationary. However, nature operates on completely different principles at the extremes—such as the Planck scale in String Theory or near a black hole singularity.
The Role of Mathematics: Frameworks like Fuzzball Complementarity show that while physical scenarios might seem completely alien or counterintuitive to us, they remain perfectly logical and consistent within the language of mathematics.
An Unavoidable Reality: As we dig deeper into quantum gravity, we must accept that reality is fundamentally different from what we perceive. Expecting the universe to always “make sense” on an intuitive level is a human-centric bias; nature’s only requirement is mathematical consistency and empirical truth.