Back
Forum Replies Created
-
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,
We only find out what we know when we try to teach.
While the proverb
each one teachimplies a value of democracy, we have to care about what we teach to teach it well and in the right way so it is understood.I have tried to teach the differences between terrestrial swamp gas northern lights and Van Allen Radiation Belts that are very high high altitude material. This material is visiting and dropping into polarcusp areas.
I lived a while in Nunavut, and it had a very unique biome. This caused a ton of baffling questions.
Circumpolar regions are what we almost never visit, and where things escape from the sun itself, when we consider polar regions of the sun.
Polar outflow also occurs on black holes, allowing for a parallel of a solarwind concept to be considered.
How can the sun have polar regions? How can Mercury have 42% oxygen levels? The sun polar regions are slower to turn than equitorial areas of the sun. And so, on rocky earth, we can think the air on terra-firma could also turn slower in polar regions.
So the topic is baffling, but then after considerations, things get sorted out.
Attatched is my topic I would like one day to take to a Doctorate level and develop.
Here is my first book, free online- ICE LIGHTS:
http://www.clgurbin.weebly.com
Enjoy!
P. S. – I am a fan of the magazine called Sky & Telescope. Thanks to Prof. Turner for enduring what was necessary for all the charts we now see from LIGO about collisions and 3-5% loss of mass after collisions. Where does the energy go?
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,
We haven`t been asked for prerequisites for this course, so it is a huge topic and needing further study. 📚
I do not know quantum mechanics.
In attending this course for better Astronomical comprehension, there are baffling moments.
I do think black holes help us to understand science better.
They help us understand at the core of most galaxies is a very large and relentless supermassive that also protects us. 🛡
From what? Most collisions have ended between stars in the maturing of the universe. But not between galaxies. We need our galactic core thug to repel and take out threats. Five times, this causes the Milky Way to grow in size.
New stars are made all the time, but not in stabilized locations such as the solar system.
The guage/gravity duality allows us to see black holes on the AdS side of things with all dynamic matter. This helps clarify what quantum mechanics must identify.
The other side has a non-linear, non-form energy that is perhaps quanta itself. 🎆
So yes, black holes help us understand quantum mechanics, but often by recognizing what black holes are not.
I often feel daunted asked such a question that is at present needing further study- it is nice to participate in discussion, but better to be accurate.
I apologize for any and all typos and quirky auto completes. Please recall device contact is 20% of communication.
Thank you to Prof. Veronika Hubeny for this course.
Is black energy from black holes? It has anti-gravitational properties. Is Hawking radiation dark energy?
Do supermassives keep the individuation or pile smaller black holes onto their pile?
If it is a bag of marbles, do they each keep their event horizons?
Curved space-times with Relativity. Black holes can orbit each other.
Sky & Telescope charts show 3-5% loss when black holes impact. Where does that go?
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is easier to look for the, and any, emergent patterns.
Something we find in Astronomy is that the scale of what is studied is often beyond comprehension.
When we see something we can easily recognize, it is on our scale of things to recognize.
The same holds true at the other end of science, in micro biologies.
Our senses are not often easily there- we need tools and tool extensions to discover nanos and super massives.
So the Goldilocks principles of being
∆
just right∆allows emergent patterns to be easier to recognize, for our individualization.
While i lived in Nunavut, i did have seven foxes for pets. Two were part husky by proximity to humans without the typical jitters that wildlife usually has.
I`ll be wrong.
Nunavut has a near outter-space biome. I was on a tree-line region. These seem to follow radiation exposure levels sometimes, not eco-potential levels.
Recognizing, and surviving this biome led me to write a series called ICE LIGHTS – relevant to relate southern science to continual bafflement of the circumpolar region without our usual equitorial spin.
Attatched is my eventually planned Doctoral thesis- so far.
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,
The properties of life from microscopic to entire planets alter depending upon the building blocks.
When we see a challenge of chemistry vs. information systems, the basic building blocks of the chemistry may decide the structures of the information systems.
When variables of cell boundaries, genetics and chemistry combine, the outcomes can alter in the forms of higher life information processes.
To be more exacting- the basis and building blocks can decide the planetary outcome.
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,
This is a complicated question that relates to the quiz question.
All factors mentioned are valid.
So when emergence is defined, we see from Wikipedia that:
<b>emergence occurs when an entity is observed to have properties its parts do not have on their own, properties or behaviors that emerge only when the parts interact in a wider whole.</b>
This definition implies a system of coordinated events, unable to be the phenomena without being the phenomena, to paraphrase William Shatner
s view of the cast of Star Trek. (They are the phenomena that create the phenomena`)Genetic, metabolic, cell boundaries, they all allow the ghost in the machine. Consciousness occurs as a trait denoting life.
Robert A. Monroe of the http://www.monroeinstitute.org insist <i>
I am more than a physical body. </i>Consciousness is what appears after proper cell boundaries, genetics, and metabolism are grouped.
Emergence is therefore fulfilled by consciousness.
Some very unique comments so far in this place.
Prof., thanks for this course. You have a lot to offer.
Concepts of advanced races include considering some want the earth left as a quiet place.
It can be challenging to set aside what`s known for your course.
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,
I do not think String Theory asks us to give up too much. Even now Einstein
s Relativity is so far holding up to JWST advances. But if we need to move beyond Einsteins limits, this is alright.Will it be law? This may take time if so, but it seems the nature of accretion material as researched by Prof. Andrew Strominger allows for other branches of previously proven work of physics to pick up slack on black hole event horizons we have not known before better technology arrived.