Back
Forum Replies Created
-
The combination of these two biggest principles is one of the biggest problems in my opinion. Each theory describes its respective regime, one for large scales and the other for the subatomic world. Combining these two types of greatness really is a challenge and that is why we are looking for this attempt. Claiming to be correct or not is hasty.
It is natural for contradictions to occur in physics. All of this happens because it will depend on the type of reference adopted, that is, the regime that is being imposed. For example, is the discussion from a classical or quantum point of view? What dimensionality are you dealing with? Are there more variables in the system? So depending on the type of regime, variable and dimensionality, among other issues, there will be contradictions in the discussions. These contradictions are good because they encourage deeper thinking and this makes scientific work progress, improving the tools for experimentation and techniques for discussing the subject in question.
Yes, because it is a compact and real object to try to describe theoretical discussions such as superstrings or other theories trying to describe quantum gravity for example. Black holes have important variables for these types of studies and in the entropy formula, we can observe thermodynamics, Planck’s constant, gravitation and special relativity.
It is an excellent object to study and I believe that this entire discussion will become more consistent as we are able to understand the entropy and information processes of black holes.
It’s one thing for me to observe an experiment without a tool that requires feedback for it. With the naked eye, for example, I do not believe that interference occurs, but when light or another object hits, yes, I believe that interference occurs in the measurement. In the case of the cat, as we only have to open the box, we can only expect one or the other state, but never both.