Forum Replies Created
-
January 18, 2021 at 10:22 am
At the end of yhe video you see a blue and a red axis at the left of the screen and the moving blue nowline of the moving frame at the right of the screen. In the video the time at x=0 (red line) and x’=0 (blue line) stay the same, This cannot be because t’= t/γ.
January 13, 2021 at 10:15 amThe line t’ (x’=0) marks the transition from clocks lagging behind (right of the line) and clocks that are ahead (left of the line). All according to the observers in rest.
January 5, 2021 at 12:41 pmTime is (equally) changed for all directions, so the speeds must have changed too.
November 25, 2020 at 12:03 pmHi Emilio, thanks for your reaction. Today I was making a walk and I suddenly realized that Gracie’s clock at the startplace has moved to the finishplace after t’=65 min. So that’s why that clock must read 65, it’s the same clock that read 0 at the startplace at the moment of the start! Quite obvious but I missed it.
I will look into worldlines and now lines, I never used them before.November 24, 2020 at 2:29 pmHi Emilio, it’s not a problem or excercise but it is the demo in the video in 22.12. Professor Green puts the 65 at Gracie’s clock at the finish (George’s perspective). I would think it has to be placed at Gracie’s clock at the start.
I would think that Gracie’s clock at the moment of the start and at the startplace in George’s perspective reads 0. So Gracie’s clock at the moment of the start and at the finishplace because of asynchronious clocks should read : (156* 12/13C) / C2 = -144 (Clocks must lag behind)……November 24, 2020 at 7:32 amSome of the clocks haven’t been filled in.
1 Gracie’s clock at the finishplace at the moment of the start in George’s perspective: -144 because of the asynchronisity and in George’s perspective this clock is in the direction of the movement.
2 Gracie’s clock at the startplace at the moment of the finish in George’s perspective: 0+65=65 because of the time dilation.
This would make Gracie’s clock at the finishplace at the moment of the finish in George’s perspective: -144 + 65 =-79. That’s not the same as the 65 that professor Green shows us. What goes wrong here?November 21, 2020 at 11:51 amHi Emilio, professor Green uses the formula as derived in module 21.
November 9, 2020 at 8:17 amLooking at the video it looks like the clocks at x=0 and x’=0 are in sync and stay in sync. Shouldn’t the clock at x’=0 start to lag more and more in respect to the clock at x=0 due to the time dilation? All seen from the standpoint of team platform.
October 18, 2020 at 6:56 amI checked the lifetime of a muon: 2.1969811 * 10^-6. This gives you 5,9854 km (see calculations above).
October 18, 2020 at 6:38 amThe only conclusion I can draw is that 5,9 km is wrong. When you use the time passed on Earth (2,0113346 s * 10^-5) to calculate the distance travelled according to an observer on Earth you get 2,0113346 s * 10^-5 * 299,792*0,994 = 5,9936413 km instead of 5,9 km!! Using this 5,9936413 you find 0,655585 km as the Lorentz contracted distance. And this gives you the speed v = 0,655585 / 2,2 * 10^-6 = 297,993 km/s. This is 297,993/299792 =0,994C !
October 18, 2020 at 6:00 amThis indeed is a riddle! I agree with your calculations. Also when you calculate the time that passed on earth (2,2 * 10^-6 * gamma = 2,0113346 * 10^-5 s) and use this to calculate the speed you also get v = 5,9/2,0113346 = 293,338 km/s = 0,978C
I don’t see where this goes wrong because the only thing we use is 5,9 km, v=0,994C and lifetime muon in rest = 2,2*10^-6. All the rest is derived using gamma…….October 15, 2020 at 6:49 amIf the motion is perpendicular to the plane of the triangle the contraction will have no influence on the shape of the triangle. Therefore they will agree on the slope. If the motion is not perpendicular to the plane of the triangle they will not agree on the slope due to the Lorentz contraction.
