Back
Forum Replies Created
-
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Antonio’s comment on the genius needs developing. Galileo was also an upstart, an iconoclast, and a rebel.
In my opinion, as even in Calgary people disbelieve the Earth is round, the Foucault Pendulums need to be built in most cities to retain & justify that memory, and as good art.
CLG
🙂
🍵☕🍵🍵 Ladies and Gentlemen,
Einstein used the metric of c, the universal constant to define Relativity.
We can set aside space-time to view Quantum Gravity, but we can also simply keep them separate, large and small, Gravity and Nuclear applications.
Quantum Gravity uses particle science on the whole spectrum to define Quantum Gravity. This was unavailable at the time Relativity was formed.
Thanks to Professor van Raamsdonk for the course and topic. Thanks to WSU for the course and challenging questions!
Thanks to Prof. Priya for her insight to how our science is almost never unbiased.
🙂🍵☕🍵🍵
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Viewed at the subatomic level, we see radiation and matter.
The Quantum gravity applies subatomic insights.
Dr. Frederick Alzofon and his son David present us evidence that we need a Quantum gravity that leaves Einstein Relativity alone.
Dr. Alzofon spent his life researching the Quantum Gravity, but politics never allowed it to see the light of day. He may have died a broken man, but he found it.
His son now continues the exposure. While we see this develops from CERN insights, earlier generations never had particle science.
The emergence of quantum gravity to explain stellar observations is required in a greater reality of world Astronomy efforts that now act more group- like than individual.
With the ending of NPT by the Greater Reality, we see Quantum Gravity allows a technology edge worth pursuing. We have both theory and an experiment already performed and can replicate these on good theory.
🙂🍵☕🍵🍵
Thanks for the course to Professor Van Raamsdonk. Thanks to WSU for the challenge recognized here.
Dr. Frederick Alzofon has decided a form also of quantum Gravity, while in reverence to Einstein.
Gravity Control with Present Technology, Alzofon, 2017 (8?) is the book.
So we keep Einstein’s Relativity and his bomb from E=mc^2. But we also allow quantum gravity.
Ladies & Gentlemen,
We need a space platform Particle Accelerator but then that needs its own nuclear power, currently not possible with Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Is a rogue nation with high energy collisions in space going to be targeted for sanctions?
Will science go rogue for a better,
high energy collider?CLG
🙂
🍵☕🍵🍵 Entanglement concepts may carry a qualtiy of consciousness.
Entangled people become each other, both genetically but also in the mind.
Prof. Greene allows for sonsciousness as perhaps being a factor as important as matter- energy- space- and time.
At the http://www.monroeinstitue.org we call this MEST.
LIGO has a well thought success and Prof. Weiss has a Nobel prize people can see at LIGO`s public outreach building. Upgrades to LIGO sure add more classification dimensions, and extend the sciences, 10*andon.
Prof. Weiss needs to be added to Mt. Rushmore. His efforts include also the Space Station, the four great Observatories in space and more. Space force now talks of observing the Earth in all spectrums, but Astronomy led that idea.
We need to lead the exo-planet discovery also for over-population, land price realities and Milky Way ownership- the whole place of 20% habitability rates for all the galaxy stars. Space Force could also follow that lead that Prof. Weiss contributes to.
As a grandfather of modern Reagen-era Astronomy and more, Prof. Weiss`s insights are good for a place with other firmament individuals of Astrophysics also needing a new Mt. Rushmore place.
🙂
There was an era with Vannavar Bush and the USA National Science Foundation.
How that worked was by allowing military hand-me-downs into the Astronomy sector.
How to make that possible again could redirect military efforts to space, not to Nobel disapproved war.
So, we allow nuclear science to build a research nuclear reactor on the ISS.
We allow nuclear space propulsion currently in moratorium.
This ends the destruction of Canadian Atomic energy nuclear research by terror groups and allows international progress on nuclear star power in the radiation zone it originated it.
And this updates nuclear and cosmic ray shielding for astronauts that currently concern MIT Prof. Jeffrey.
The shielding is copper beryllium and boron sulfide clothing for cosmic rays, mostly protons.
Two bird, one stone, but Nobels may contend this leeway.
🙂🍵☕🍵🍵
Part of the serendipity in science is the recognition of skills required to notice the oddball.
Ammonia goes liquid at minus thirty Celsius.
Water finalizes molecular motion at minus forty Celsius.
The… serendipity… of Prof. Kim of Soeul National University states many Nobel prizes are won not by intention, but as a product of a race to discover.
Many people are onboard a popular topic, and that is the lead and driving force of discovery- also where funding is alloted.
Both Astronomy and physics have discovered oddballs while on different courses of action.
Why is Dark Matter now used to describe Galactic… proto-disc… collapse now that it is a topic? Because it shows an origin of Dark Energy as a source of Hubble expansion.
If we look at what we have in life and what we extend ourselves to, we find this is not such a bad thing.
To figure out just this one galaxy is an alright limitation.
One story that recently popped up relating to this was by an individual deciding to train for the freedom of awareness.
Courtney Brown says that in our galaxy, the Hedonism of the… Species some call Greys… eventually decided they would have no reproductive ability as individuals after ruining their homeworld.
But their Genetic meanderings and stellar wanderings allow them more access to cruise the Milky Way. And some think Greys are overboard in cloning tactics.
Humanity seems to be figuring out the carbon-silicate cycle, just on a cusp of robotic star exploration.
I think because the CFC was something the entire world recognized as a factor for ozone that humanity may not allow things to go so overboard as how Courteney Brown claims hedonism did for Grey species.
Who knows if Courtney Brown is accurate, but there has been world responses to environment alterations before. The history of the universe can always reveal more. One account read yesterday now incorporates dark matter in collapsing proto-star discs. Never saw that updated version til yesterday.
So, if we have a centricity to perspective, the Astronomical world community at least will not enslave us to religion nor make us fight religious-cult wars for Holy Roman Empire acquisitions.
🙂🍵☕🍵🍵
Hello Ladies and Gentlemen,
When we see Prof. Greene states in his book To the End Of Time how black holes get smaller as they get hotter, do we see this end opacity of fluorescence?
If visible light ends by the temperature, this is not black hole science alone, but plasma science.
Does a super massive black hole collapsed from Prof. Freese`s dark stars also allow for greater visibility if they are larger and cooler?
🙂🍵☕🍵🍵
Ladies and Gentlemen,
While our Nobels attempt to protest war involvement, never a complete agreed circumstance, we can support their teaching.
This diagram shows the unity of the unified theory.
Some make a conversation out of the diagram alone.
Thank you to Brian Greene for WSU, his patience, and to his collaborators that… I think notice an often growing gap between advances and public knowledge.
We are fortunate WSU brings us up to speed on modern events.
But look for Brian Greene also on Pinterest. He likes plasma pics!
🙂🍵☕🍵🍵p. s. – The Feynmen diagrams of colours and quarks were never known when i was a kid.
There are good Youtube standard model tutorials online. Fields that hold and uncouple according to only temperature allow plasma a more full range of science.
In space-time, Prof. Greene says black holes grow hotter when smaller- do they reverse the big bang for us to see history in reverse? Do photons recouple to electrons in a black hole?
🙂
Recent cortical sheet parallels are found in studies of thin sheets of water, i think by Oxford in the UK, but i only have a Cambridge news feed.
So Cambridge shows the sheer electroconductabiliy for small water molecule width that is not recognized as an energy carrier in water of greater depths past sheet depth mentioned here.
It seems a paradox on less allowing more.