World Science Scholars

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Very well said. There is one point I do not agree with but it may be that it needs more detail .You mention that we have no control of what happens. This is an issue of probability waves rather than having no free will. Excellent response.

    It is an interesting idea that your two examples are possibly a form of free will. could they instead be examples of self-awareness?

    For now, I agree with Ayan Paul.

    Knowingly misrepresenting research data has no place in science or any other field. Honestly making big claims is okay because it alerts the community to spend time to verify the claim in a timely manner.

    Every living human beings’ decision making is based on past information that has been assimilated by the brain. The responses come from the brain based on the perceived situation. The physical body just completes the response as ordered. There never is an either/or choice by the physical body in real-time. The brain has already made the choice and passed it on to the body.

    The letter about depression has no place in this discussion. The idea that people misbehave more if they think they have no free will doesn’t mean that free will exists. He is skewing the audience toward preferring that their is free will. Preferring to believe free exists does not mean free will exists. There is no canceling of an action brought about by alleged free will. The signal to do something is what you did.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)