World Science Scholars

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • It is really both interesting and perplexing and the same time. You begin thinking you understand the physics of something and all of a sudden you get the sense that all you know is just a point in a sea of information, which is normally overwhelming for the human mind to grasp.

    I believe they’re both equally important but they differ in how they affect the person researching. If a researcher is more competitive, the sense of competition would definitely encourage him to work more whereas for an average competent person peer collaboration would be of more significance.

    Yes, definitely. It is not a personal belief but rather a fact that no matter how much we think we know or understand, we would eventually hit a wall or fathom the physics more, marking all previous discoveries as absurd or technically false in a way. The truth is nothing is just “false”- just like the cosmological constant – they are rather essential steps to what we now know.

    The interesting part is you do not know what to expect. Whenever you learn something and you think you grasp it well enough, you begin believing there is so much more behind that, which is very relatable to dark matter and dark energy that not even experienced researchers know what to expect from.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)