World Science Scholars

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • There are so many benefits, that is exciting!
    From re-gaining the ability to sense and move, as shown in the last experiment, to maybe learn faster different skills like languages for example. But as always there is a downside in the implementation of these discoveries if we learn how to manipulate the brain in an external matter, we will be able to violate the freewill and that is dangerous. The bright side would be found if we are able to learn how to manipulate our own brain, induce this plasticity in our own system so every person is able to re-gain or develop motor, learning and sensing functions by their own.

    I would like to feel the activity of my cells in the body, as the skin regenerating or a wound healing. Of course I would also like to learn how to turn that sense on and off, in order to not become crazy.

    La idea de simular la consciencia en una computadora es interesante, pero parte de la consciencia es sensible, por muchos algoritmos y caminos que un programa de computadora pueda aprender para simular tener consciencia, siempre estará limitada. Aún cuando físicamente se pueda descubrir y replicar la generación de la consciencia, hay una parte que no tiene que ver con lo físico y esa es la que una computadora no puede tener.

    If there is no way to measure the non physical mechanism that integrate the whole conscious system, how can we know it really dies?

    It is very interesting for me, how consciousness is such a mystery even when we all experience it. I agree that it is necessary to be present in order to be conscious, otherwise we fall in these zombie behaviors, but anyways there has to be a kind of “automatic-mode consciousness” because even when we act like zombies something within us knows what we are doing, like when we are driving back home and don’t need to think, we drive automatically and yet, we get home, we don’t go anywhere else.

    Would you say that consciousness is a combination of thoughts and feelings in the adult hood, but it starts (when we are babies) by sensing the environment (both internal and external) and interpreting it, and as we grow we make the process a little bit more rational and start labeling those interpretations according to the culture and what we have learned?
    But the basis of all is that primary sense inside that are not able to explain until we know “the names” of the things and feelings? If you agree, what do you think would happen if we learned the wrong names?

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)