World Science Scholars

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • I think we should accept such theories without evidence because most of the theories that scientists are using today didn’t have 100% prove and evidence.

    It makes sense to me because for example, when we calculate distance using speed and time, we didn’t actually use a distance variable. There may also be other ways that we could calculate distance using distance variable.

    It would not bother me because I think reality is indeterministic. For example, I am currently 13 and when I get a score report from school, I could guess the score by how much I give efforts to it and how much I try. But there is still some chance that an unexpected could happen like when there is an error in the report.

    I think are the most compelling reasons to continue funding research in particle physics is to discover more and to make humanity’s knowledge in the understanding of universe to be better and to find new technologies that we didn’t know they existed. It would also improve the discoveries and proves of string theory. The greatest reason for this is to make humanity better.

    Yes. I believe that there is the end of particle physics. Even if there is the end of particle physics, I still believe that scientist would improve in what they have learned.
    Thank you Professor Barish! This lecture helps me to understand more about particle physics!

    Bigger luminosity, narrower bean at the collision point with better resolution.

    I think if we understand more about particle physic, it might eventually let to discoveries of new things that might be related to dark matter.

    I think if we find Higgs Boson, it would strongly support the supersymmetric Standard Model, which in turn supports the notion that string theory is indeed the right approach to nature.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)