World Science Scholars

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • I don’t eat seafood (though that’s a taste choice, not an ecological one). I teach earth and environmental science to high schoolers and I try to show (rather than just tell) how important the natural world is for the sake of our future survival.

    My first experiences with the ocean were watching sea lions at a pier in San Francisco (I don’t remember much more than that) and visiting the Shedd Aquarium in Chicago. I loved watching the fish swim at eye level or above.

    I’m honestly not sure how to avoid the tragedy of the commons with the ocean since most of the ocean is unregulated. Commercial, industrial-scale fishing companies can take as much as they want without upfront costs, so there is strong economic incentive to resist all regulations (imagine if you could just take all the cows from a field without paying for them or the land… there’d be no cows left). I suppose stronger international pressure to not buy from these type of operations could reduce how much the oceans are over-fished. Marine sanctuaries might help, too. Actual progress would require enforcement capabilities in as many places as possible, otherwise shady companies would just move to new locations.

    As technology costs decrease, it becomes easy and cheaper to deploy more monitors (data buoys, animal trackers, etc.), which could provide finer detail on local/regional conditions. This could help provide a better baseline to work from when monitoring the potential benefits of new programs (no-fishing zones, reduced tourism in sensitive areas, quiet zones with reduced shipping, etc.). If the better data provided good evidence of benefits, we could focus our resources on the most effective approaches and the ocean would benefit.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)