Back
Forum Replies Created
-
No, given my background in military. Science is amazing, but as a national priority is not the way to go. The initiative should be national, but not a priority. Perhaps why scientists are constantly fighting with politics in how to get their projects funded. Survival is the only priority. Remember, science is important, but the soldiers in the front line are the ones risking it all.
Justin Khoury is right by referring that scientist who proposed that the hellow which Dark Matter affects the tension of gravity between galaxy systems is due to superfluids…I don’t know much like a professional scientists, that does make more sense than the fake dark matter theory scientists are trying to believe their paycheck on.
if you replicate the full experiment, at a quantum level, for instance a quantum interferometer that can detect when small particle collide, you can complement CERN at making predictions like how the higgs field is affect by such collisions….These are my thoughts: LIGO is a large version of such experiment, and QIGO could be the quantum level derivation which can achieve such a thing…my real question is, why not marry both CERN and LIGO to achieve the QIGO/LHC. Kind of a weird thought, but science started from weird, which later was named, science fiction, which later turned out to be verifiable and confirmed, leading to the Laws of Physics, etc. I say, build QIGO/LHC and you can intensify the reality of how particles under collision, specially the Higgs Field behave.
politics here in the US plays a big role in funding the projects that scientists could conceive…if it were not because of politics, scientists would’ve already tried to option to envision at building a Dyson Sphere. But who is going to fund such project at the rate that projects like LIGO or CERN get funded by politics.
I just think that the very essence of gravity is not contain in a gravity particle like the graviton. Instead, it is the same notion of feeling the force of gravity by entering the system that continues the gravitational pull would surpass the object being affected by it. For example, if there was no gravity on earth, then like in the moon, the closer we get to a greater object that has a gravitational pull like the sun, the more gravity influence we would perceive the closer we get to the sun. However, since we do have gravity on earth, we don’t perceive the gravitational pull from the sun, for instance tangible to Schwarzschild radius. To verify this, scientist can simulate the absence of gravity on earth, and what would happen if they place the earth closer to the sun, then the gravitational pull of the sun should then overcome the little gravity the earth has in the absence of such gravitational system that we currently have on earth.
When a body is withdrawn from reality, the ethical complication is to accept, am I really under my own will, or is it the machine that controls me. No one imagines a paraplegic committing a crime, for him/her later to declare himself/herself exempted from the law under the supposition that he was not him/her who did the crime, but rather the machine in them.
my ideas don’t involve an exoskeleton. I mean to suggest, writing an AI that can be implanted into a brain machine to allow it to reteach the body how to do its motor skills. the problem with this research is that they are planning the methodology the wrong way. It would be best to write an AI that can be mimic the neuro-transmissions of the brain. This way we don’t enclose ourselves into a machine, the AI could help us achieve more into how the severed spine can relearn to reconnect the brain.
while these studies show progress in how to achieve brainets coordination, it would be intriguing to find whether the findings of such brain activity patterns can be collective use to create coordination in a monkey or human whom motor skills have been severed. Like paraplegics who need to teach their spine to assimilate coordination. Could it be possible to extract the senses out of these equations, so that said program be imbedded onto a being that requires such motor skills. For example, if I lose the ability to move my right leg to conform the ability to fully stand up right, and walk normally. What can a designated program built for the being could do? Could it help that being achieve the motor skills necessary for him/her to learn how to walk again, by allowing the program to teach the brain of the being in how to achieve such goals.
while these studies show progress in how to achieve brainets coordination, it would be intriguing to find whether the findings of such brain activity patterns can be collective use to create coordination in a monkey or human whom motor skills have been severed. Like paraplegics who need to teach their spine to assimilate coordination. Could it be possible to extract the senses out of these equations, so that said program be imbedded onto a being that requires such motor skills. For example, if I lose the ability to move my right leg to conform the ability to fully stand up right, and walk normally. What can a designated program built for the being could do? Could it help that being achieve the motor skills necessary for him/her to learn how to walk again, by allowing the program to teach the brain of the being in how to achieve such goals.
I would try to recreate an eprom. Which turns out to be the bootstrap program that allows the computer to map its logical addresses. With this technology, as I teach my brain to remember like the eprom does, my thoughts and senses can be recreate either in the same body after a traumatic accident, or in another body, per say, transcend to overcome our short lived lives.
Can these brain machines also be used to recreate or create speech commands that allows the subject to make sense of their impulses to describe their feelings or experience? I am very interested in this subject for many reasons. For example, I am a Traumatic Brain Injury survivor. One experience I had the day I came back from the como-tose state, I was found only within the 2 weeks after the accident. At that moment I could say word, the moment I didn’t know my name. If it were not for the nurse who got me to remember my name, I wouldn’t had been able to speak. That’s why I ask the question above, because these said brain machines could we be used in humans that lose their ability to speak, for them to be able to regain speech if implanted with the said brain machines that will allow to say what they are not able to say, while lacking the normal ability to speak.