The fragility of human life on external factors e.g asteroid impact, unanticipated planetary collision e.t.c significantly weakens your proposition on human beings being the most significant creation. Nature, from my point of view, doesn’t make a mistake in the occurrence of its phenomena. As evolutionary biology proposes, chances of us being here for this whole time have been propelled by sheer luck and significantly more on our inability to comprehend the uncertainty that lies outside this rock. Right now, 21st century, we can see the imminent danger/advantages we might have towards the cosmos which certainly doesn’t conform to our expectations as “superior beings”. Let’s not be delusional.

I opine that having a key , which is a theory is more substantial and more approving than being without one. It shows that we have the capability to think and not being able to provide tangible tests to support inflation theory does not lead to automatic cancellation of the theory rather it invokes us to think beyond the scope. Until a more proven theory is available, we should work with already set theories

C is the maximum speed any particle can achieve as at now and this presents a liability to discovering new physics beyond bombarding protons at c. Maybe accelerating the particles beyond c may result into something more complex and new, who knows!

It will assist in precise determination of the Hubble Constant and hopefully unlock the secrets of the universe