World Science Scholars

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • NO.

    Wait some more years and you will get your answer from Quantum Realm.

    Yes, but I don’t have time to explain it.

    No ans. sorry, I need more information on this topic.

    No, it was near but not perfectly fit with all properties of the universe. I think, we need some more knowledge of quantum world to solve this.

    This is not very unusual especially when we looking for a very deep theory. In my opinion now we should have to look further with a new idea…

    yes, it is possible to find a “theory of everything.” But there is some defect or incompleteness in some theories of physics. Something is near but still far….

    Yes, we need a reformation on general theory of relativity. Then we can think about unification of mathematics or physics to give a big push on quantum manipulation.

    Amazing man…

    Of course yes, here circle is 2D but sphere is a 3D object. Hence sphere have more symmetrical transformations and we can say that sphere is more symmetrical than circle.

    Maths is inherent to nature. The whole Universe is exist under some fixed physical properties depend on different condition. We just discovered mathematics within this physical universe and use it as a special way to discover or properly describe those physical property of the universe. I don’t think so mathematics exists by itself without physics.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)