Forum Replies Created
-
April 6, 2023 at 3:38 pm
Who would look for an answer without a question? Contradiction’s ask the questions, breakthroughs supply the answers.
April 5, 2023 at 7:55 amincreasing knowledge is what science is for so more is better.
April 5, 2023 at 7:35 amAs long as we have curiosity we will advance, so even if we can’t see how now, it won’t eliminate future advancement.
April 5, 2023 at 7:15 amIncrease length power precision, and better theories to put in, as the old saying goes ‘garbage in, garbage out’. Let’s face it you have to have a question to pursue answers.
April 5, 2023 at 6:48 amIf it’s a particle than you have a good chance, if it’s some other feature of a force that’s not understood yet your tests won’t show it, hence the name dark.
April 5, 2023 at 6:29 amBetter colliders, higher energy, higher better knowledge simple.
April 5, 2023 at 6:03 amNeed more input, always funding, maybe colliders around earth or possibly solar system size, galactic? what do you think of one in orbit of the great attractor? Limits are what we put on ourselves.
April 4, 2023 at 1:15 pmmm mm more mind nourishment. If this keeps up I’ll not be able to keep up with my thoughts. Then they’ll keep expanding beyond my reach, thanks so much for all this new knowledge>
April 4, 2023 at 12:34 pmhmm, what if, virtual particles produce a gravity halo that then collapses with the annihilation of the particles, causing repulsion, whereas non-virtual particles create that same halo without a collapse and so combines and strengthens from more and more particles causing higher attraction than the particles themselves are capable of, and those halos intersect in galactic clusters holding them tighter as well. How that can be checked other than going through past data and finding a correlation that shows it, I’m not quite sure. Sometimes I feel I should just say ‘I don’t know’ and leave it at that, but I can’t keep my mouth shut because I don’t know and I want to know.
April 4, 2023 at 12:33 pmhmm, what if, virtual particles produce a gravity halo that then collapses with the annihilation of the particles, causing repulsion, whereas non-virtual particles create that same halo without a collapse combines and strengthens from more and more particles causing higher attraction than the particles themselves are capable of, and those halos intersect in galactic clusters holding them tighter as well. How that can be checked other than going through past data and finding a correlation that shows it, I’m not quite sure. Sometimes I feel I should just say ‘I don’t know’ and leave it at that, but I can’t keep my mouth shut because I don’t know and I want to know.
April 4, 2023 at 11:57 amI think we need to pursue all that we can then keep going till we find it. As well, we may need to go back over the last few centuries to see if we maybe missed something along the way. Forward reverse forward reverse until we finally make it make sense.
April 4, 2023 at 10:33 amGravity wave distortion comes to mind from LIGO, cosmology, new candles to measure with. Well and of course the answer to all that we don’t have yet.
April 4, 2023 at 10:28 amwhat if there’s a force instead of a particle that accounts for the missing matter?
April 4, 2023 at 10:21 amMaybe the force of gravity radiates to form the halo at galactic + levels of mass but has little to no effect inside the solar system halo. So each stellar system would act like the solar system but their halo’s combine on galactic scale to act like matter, just a thought.
