Is the math just an elaborate way to describe what Einstein, Newton and the rest saw in their mind. For instance another dimension exists in my mind in which all things in the universe are not only in our four detectable dimensions, but also have a line that connects them all together. From that thought comes my realization that all things are in fact Quantum Entangled, but from our spot we can’t see or measure the affect. And no I can’t describe that with my current math skills.

This has been an interesting thought experiment. Fuzzballs Singularities Quanta all to describe a Microverse within the Universe, maybe once we understand the Universe we will be able to describe the Microverse.

Model’s and theories guide our knowledge quest, they can never be the end all. We work with what we have at the time then look and see if we got it right, The looking and seeing can never be entirely replaced by simulations that only rely on theory and not observation of actuality.

I get information loss all the time it’s called age, and I will eventually collapse into…??? Hmm, maybe I’m paradoxical, I should reexamine my existence.

hmm zero mass black hole? I think we are coming up on a drop of knowledge in the vast ocean of the universe, so the prospects of learning more become exponential.

In my mind homogenous in macro doesn’t in any way correlate to homogeneity in micro so no problem. I mean if you mix stuff together homogeneously it doesn’t have to change the stuff so you would still have differing particles in micro.

Certainly things can be missed, just as this could have been assigned to an engineering or construction mishap and ignored, good science prevailed here.

mistakes are just what we use to know how to go farther, was it Edison who said about his fails that they were not failures he just discovered 867 ways not to make a light bulb?