wonderful prospects.

we’ll find it or disprove it entirely eventually, my current guess concludes that it may be proton’s decayed to the point they no longer luminesce, and at that instant transform from energy and zero mass to dark matter/energy with high mass but such a small area maybe smaller than plank size, so it only affects the gravity above plank size. Just meanderings of an old retired coal miner.

knowing the math would not make us the math, there is math that can be derived or inferred for nearly everything, but it still doesn’t make anything only math. That being said knowledge is our lifeblood without it we are nothing.

so again it comes down to what we can see, so until we view farther this is all we accept.

Significantly insignificant, to the extent that we become very significant. I think of all the things we see that have no e intelligence, vs. all the things with, and putting that into the equation we seem very significant. Just a thought from an old retired coal miner.

hmm, one of the things that hits me is this, what if, what we have observed has merely been misinterpreted, And what has been seen isn’t evidence of a Big Bang but just the decay of photons that have a 13.8 billion light year lifespan. Consider if photons didn’t decay light would occlude all else and we would have daylight all the time. So redshift is from distance and speed instead of just speed. like I said ‘yum yum’ more knowledge is always good.

I still prefer the eternal model, but something else popped into my brain, could supermassive black holes be regions of contraction described in the bounces? Which in turn attract matter to them i.e. galaxies. yum yum food for thought.

Any theory that develops such high probability of being wrong in any other science would be enough to disprove said theory, so why not this one?